This post originally appeared on my blog — https://kevindstevens.com
COVID accelerates the trend of negative energy prices
The COVID pandemic has drastically decreased commercial and industrial power demand across the globe. As a result, some countries like the UK and Germany are seeing an acceleration in the occurrence of negative wholesale energy rates.
Germany has seen the most instances of negative prices. In the 15-minute intraday auctions of power for on the Epex Spot SE exchange, rates fell below zero 773 times in the first quarter, a 78% jump from the same period a year earlier. Those rates were also 23% lower overall.
However, negative wholesale rates aren’t just a COVID or EU phenomenon. They are increasing in the US too — a trend that started in 2015.
Image source: Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
Why do energy prices go negative?
The reason wholesale energy prices go negative is obvious: supply drastically outpaces demand. Currently, electricity grids in the US and Europe are not flexible enough to dynamically match these two economic forces.
Electricity is a rare commodity in two respects. First, it has zero shelf life, meaning use (or store) it or lose it. Second, power plants cannot start and stop on demand.
This means it is often cheaper for a power plant to remain running during times of negative prices. That’s true for both the immediate term and long-term with maintenance costs are factored in.
Are negative rates good for the customer?
Not yet, and there is a potential downside looming. The majority of residential customers do not participate in the wholesale energy market, and cannot take advantage of lower prices.
Additionally, negative prices mean power generators sell their product at a loss, or when grid operators order wind farms to stop electricity generation, affected generators receive compensation payments.
This has two potentially negative consequences.
First, these costs eventually find their way to the consumer. They may be passed on to the utility which then passes it on to the customer, or if the utility is the generator, passed on to the customer in a rate case.
Second, without long-term PPA’s new investment in clean energy generation declines. Less investment in clean energy hampers our ability to reduce emissions in the power sector.
It should be noted that incidences of negative prices do not always directly impact the revenues earned by generators.
Some generators are hedged from market prices through long-term bilateral contracts (e.g., power-purchase agreements commonly used by wind and solar plants), and some do not participate in real-time market balancing.
A Note on Market Structures
One important caveat to today’s newsletter: electricity markets are complex and vary across markets. ERCOT (TX), CAISO (CA), PJM (mid-Atlantic + Chicago), MISO (Midwest US), and Europe all have slightly different structures.
The result is a generalization of negative prices, but a broader discussion about which market structures optimize supply and demand is worth consideration.
Markets with higher penetration of wind and solar are more likely to see time segments with negative rates. In the US, ERCOT, CAISO, and MISO are the most susceptible to negative rates. In the EU, it’s Germany and the UK.
Negative Rates = New Opportunities
Wind and solar have basically zero marginal cost (remember that once the plants are built, fuel from the wind and sun are free at the margin), and their share of generation will only continue to increase.
Markets grow when consumption is encouraged. This creates more revenue, more investment, and more value for all participants in a system.
If we can connect the consumer to the wholesale markets to access power sources dominated by fixed costs and place a price on the benefits of grid flexibility, new business models will emerge.
For the first time in energy, we’re on a potential path to a market structure that empowers people to consume an unlimited amount of multi-trillion dollar commodity.
Which other modern industry spent decades on fixed costs to ultimately unlock unlimited consumption of a commodity?
Cable, which led to the consumption of data with almost zero marginal cost to the provider.
Otherwise known as, high-speed internet. Is energy next?